If talking to turkeys arouses suspicion that the human race has gone berserk, don't worry because I'm with you. Apparently the article writer (Bill Buford) feels fascinated that communicating with turkeys is worth his and your time. "Talking Turkey" by Bill Buford from the New Yorker November 2006 edition is appealing to an audience of well let's say extraordinary. With the right imagination the article at times becomes interesting, if you don't get lost from the writer skipping from personal stories to history lessons to other stories within the same paragraph.
However critical I may be, Buford has (if science is your thing) organized an essay with descriptive detail and historical accuracy. With a sense of fascination and interest in turkeys, Buford writes an informative but very personal article. His opinions and personal experiences are meshed in with the actual article. There are times, never the less, that the author's voice is sarcastic and borderline downright amused about the topic of man talking to a turkey. Even Joe Hutto, the man who says he can talk with turkeys, finds it hard to persuade people of his perfected talent. Buford's choice of words to describe the Joe Hutto are one of a kind. Describing Joe as boyish with delicate shoulders does not do Joe justice until Buford says Hutto reminds him of an antelope. What can you say? This guy has raised everything between coyotes, owls, black bears , deer, monkeys, and opossums.
This article for obvious reasons is to entertain and inform the audience of facts most likely only needed for game shows such as Jeopardy. But let not that spoil the playful article from giving a highly intellectual representation of Joe Hutto attempting to shorten the distance between humans and animals communicating. "Slowly, Hutto came to see that he could also tell the birds where to go, or what to look for... until finally they reached a point where they had no "significant miscommunication." Imprinting, the process of convincng newborn animals that you are thier parent, is the means of establishing a connection. The point Buford is trying to get to is that humans make generalizations of animals way to early to notice that they too have unique characteristics that make them special and in some cases better than humans. Hutto says,"A tiny flicker of motion fifty yards away gets their (wild turkeys) attention ...". This makes me and I'm sure everyone else feel dull and lethargic comapred to these wild turkeys. Additionally, humans do not appreciate the serenity and beauty of our environment and how we take for granted the other species that also share the same habitat. I'd like to finish this blog with a quote from Bill Buford," I came away with a sense that there was an order in an environment that seemed otherwise crowded and overgrown and impenetrable... and I found myself feeling an abstract interconnectedness: the fossils, the memory of mammoths, estuaries everywhere, the history of hunters and gatherers, these elusive birds."
Tuesday, September 4, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Good job Navid. I think it's very interesting that, at the very end of your article, you finally give us the "so what." What I'd like to see is how, very specifically how, the author establishes the "so what." Show me the words and phrases that accomplish this goal.
Your opening sentence is fantastic, and I really liked the tone of your essay, kind of a "wink wink, can you believe this guy" thing. I'd like for you to focus a bit more directly on the text next time. But, for a first entry, this is very good.
Yeah...talking to turkeys is just...off...xD I'm with ya there...
I liked your blog entry. But do you really think that this talking to turkeys thing will actually benefit us as humans??? Jus wondering about where you stand on the subject. I think it's crazy.
Sounds like a fun article. I like that you point out that “the author's voice is sarcastic and borderline downright amused about the topic of man talking to a turkey.” If the author hadn’t let some of his amusement show, the article probably wouldn’t have seemed very ‘real’. I mean, who isn’t amused by a guy talking to a turkey?
As for the benefit that we get out of it, so what if there isn’t one? People do pointless things all the time. Whatever floats the guy’s boat, eh? As long as he’s not harming the turkeys in any way (they might even enjoy his company), I see no problems with it.
very interesting article. i think its crazy that a guy is trying to talk with turkeys. i like your view of the author's take on the talking turkey guy.
"This article for obvious reasons is to entertain and inform the audience of facts most likely only needed for game shows such as Jeopardy."
That pretty much sums it up!
I think you could have spent a little more time with analysis, but I really like how you bridged the gap between human and bird communication, without sounding too creepy.
I don't think much about turkeys other than eating them on holiday dinners. But now, I'll definitely wonder what the turkey's last words were before it was sentenced to be my Christmas dinner.
Post a Comment